CEOs have a potential conflict of interest when their company is acquired: they can bargain to be retained by the acquirer and for private benefits rather than for a higher premium to be paid to the shareholders. ... we find no evidence that the premium paid is lower when the CEO is retained by the acquirer. Strikingly, the target stock price increases more at the announcement of an acquisition by a private firm when the CEO is retained than when she is not. This result holds whether the private acquirer is a private equity firm or an operating company and for management buyouts.
Monday, November 2, 2009
This is unexpected
A new research paper finds that target CEO's do NOT sell out their shareholders in order to keep their jobs in a merger:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment