McCain and Obama talk constantly about how much they will "invest" -- with money taken from the taxpayers, of course -- to achieve energy independence. "[W]e can provide loan guarantees and venture capital to those with the best plans to develop and sell biofuels on a commercial market," Obama said.Thanks to Quirk.
What makes Obama think he's qualified to pick the "best plans"? It's the robust competition of the free market that reveals what's best. Obama's program would preempt the only good method we have for learning which form of energy is best.
Has he learned nothing from the conceits of his predecessors? Jimmy Carter, saying that achieving energy independence was the "moral equivalent of war," called for "the most massive peacetime commitment of funds ... to develop America's own alternative". Then he wasted billions of our tax dollars on the utterly failed "synfuel" program.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
The idiocy of "energy independence"
Trade is good, autarky is bad, and Stossel seems like the only journalist who knows how to think.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Bob Higgs's recent call for "banana independence" is also quite good on this pointReplyDelete