Border Security Type I and Type II Errors

One way of looking at the a policy of increased ICE enforcement of US border security is as a debate over decision error costs. The expressed goal is to remove the worst of the worst criminals. Few would disagree with this goal. However, in this dragnet, immigrants without criminal backgrounds have also been detained. The administration may see this as representing a small cost to pay, while the protesters see this as an unacceptable consequence.

The graphic below from the Financial Times indicates how many more criminal and non-criminal detainees the policy change has resulted in. Your position in this debate likely comes down to whether you think the benefit of detaining ~6,000 more criminals outweighs the cost of detaining ~25,000 more with no criminal background. Reasonable people can disagree over what would be acceptable, but few have stated what value they consider to be acceptable.

(I understand there is also debate over what are acceptable detention tactics.)