Ted Snyder, fellow Antitrust Division alum, is trying to turn around Yale's Management School. He noted a number of past mistakes:
Specifically, Yale “lost $15 to $20 million over the last 15 years,” says Edward Snyder, the new dean of the Yale School of Management. It remained small (400 students), maintained an unusually low student-to-faculty ratio of 8 to 1 (most top schools are closer to 20 to 1) and offered only limited versions of some of its industry’s most lucrative products (like part-time and executive M.B.A.’s). Most significantly it developed a reputation as a bastion of socially minded do-gooders who were less focused on maximizing profit. According to Bloomberg Businessweek’s latest rankings of the top M.B.A. programs, Yale placed 21st, right behind Michigan State.Ted has a five step plan for turning around any middling business school:
- 1. Start by focusing on the sectors where the school has strong relationships and build from there. Or, as Snyder says, ‘‘Give up the undifferentiated, multi-brass-ring strategy of best recruiters, best students, best facilities, blah, blah, blah.’’
- 2. Embrace a mix of faculty, particularly those with real-world experience. ‘‘You’ll still want some strong, fast-ball-discipline types in areas like economics, finance and psychology to teach how markets work and function,’’ Snyder says. ‘‘But get fewer of them.’’
- 3. Calculate the cost of things — any things! ‘‘Be very focused on and systematic about collecting data and sharing data with other schools around the country and the world,’’ he says. ‘‘Collect data on industries and on markets. It’s really valuable for students to do that, and you’ll make your school valuable for insight and information.’’ Extra credit: ‘‘It’s good for branding.’’
- 4. Offer a broader mix of programs, including part-time ones. ‘‘That’s more affordable in today’s economy and where the market at business schools is going.’’
- 5. Book your ticket to Gdansk! ‘‘If you’re going to be global, be selective and try to identify a less well served country like Vietnam or Poland instead of China. Pick places with young populations that don’t already have a lot of business schools.’’
Nice Business school stragegy
ReplyDeleteTImesbusiness school
When I think of economics & business, I think of being conservative (right side of the street), when I think of Yale, I think the opposite; assuming it's not just me, until that perception is fixed, the problems will remain...
ReplyDeleteArlie, great point and I think they can change. Snyder seems to have a great plan and with time will be able to turn things around. Schools are businesses too and the sooner administrators and boards realize that the more successful they will be.
ReplyDeleteI think the most interesting part of the strategy is #5. Mr. Synder views expanding into untapped or low business school presense markets as a key to the strategy. The best way to reduce competitive intensity is to go where there is little competition with a strong enough demand. From the Industry Orgnization perspective, this gives them the advantage of Porter's Fire Forces Model within the industry but in a more concentrated market.
ReplyDeleteYou can see Vanderbilt following a similar path. The Healthcare MBA program exploits Vanderbilt's strong positioning in a Healthcare capitol. The Americas MBA focuses on some already tapped regions of the globe, but utilizes its relationships with businesses headquartered locally already doing business in these regions. The emphasis on adjunct faculty brings in more people with more "real world" experience. My question is what should Vanderbilt do next?
ReplyDeleteI see more and more online MBA programs popping up, some good some bad. I think this is new strategy moving forward for a lot of accredited universities.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing as it is an excellent post would love to read your future post -for more knowledge Best college for mba in bangalore | MBA bangalore
ReplyDeleteThe most pointed comment re: MBA degrees in the article for me was this: '...helping a tiny group of ambitious overachievers pay a fortune for a degree that seems more about helping people get a job than preparing them to do it.' That's a worry I think I share with my fellow students. What is my ROI 5 years down the road? How well will this investment pay off when I need real skills beyond the interview? I think the answers to that question and others are going to come from alumni, my fellow students and their experiences just as much as the experiences shared by the faculty in their classes...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHere's an article that calls into question the validity of the Bloomberg Businessweek metric used by Edward Snyder to measure his own school's success. Yale was 6th in 2014, 11th in 2015 14th in 2016 and finally 16th in 2017. Indiana's Kelley school experienced even more volatility, moving over 30 places in one year...
ReplyDelete"...scores on student surveys are ridiculously clustered close together. So minute fractions of a change can create major swings in rankings, even though those swings are not statistically significant. That is why Kelley fell from first to 32nd, and why Cornell’s Johnson School climbed 34 positions to rank third this year from 37th in 2016. It’s also why the University of Texas McCombs School soared 29 places to rank 26th and Houston’s Bauer School rushed ahead 26 spots to place 24th or the University of Maryland’s plunged 30 places to rank 39th after finishing ninth last year."
https://poetsandquants.com/2017/11/19/ten-biggest-surprises-in-bloomberg-businessweeks-2017-mba-ranking/4/
Long gone are the days where the University of Phoenix was seen as the online school that provided a suite of degree options. Many top-tier MBA programs, such as Carnegie Mellon and Michigan Ross, have online MBA programs to complement their in-classroom experiences. As we continue to get into the Internet of Things, it makes me curious to see how the educational landscape will continue to evolve.
ReplyDelete