tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post2471510997522405618..comments2024-03-28T04:18:27.812-05:00Comments on Managerial Econ: When is inequality bad?Luke Froebhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06832270922187297624noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post-80124777580479502952015-11-08T06:20:36.442-06:002015-11-08T06:20:36.442-06:00You are always perfect in how you describe things,...You are always perfect in how you describe things, I really love it! I am usually doing Forex trading for which I get a lot of interesting stuff from here, so that’s why I always suggest my friends to be here to finds useful things. I work with OctaFX broker and they are generally my first way go help with having high skill traders providing us with daily market news and reports, so with that I am never really concern about anything.Roshannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post-37766862360367835472012-12-09T14:38:09.308-06:002012-12-09T14:38:09.308-06:00I echo BJ. The survival of the fittest should be t...I echo BJ. The survival of the fittest should be the strategy for the governments. No subsidy, no favoritism. Ahsley is right in saying that the wealthy will be willing to leave the country if they are not been given incentives. Let them leave and let a new breed of wealthy emerge. Everyone should get a fair chance at making wealth. Anshulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08058473956843617814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post-60136357201611811342012-11-07T18:14:29.623-06:002012-11-07T18:14:29.623-06:00Much like your post about subsidizing risk. If the...Much like your post about subsidizing risk. If the government would allow failure as an option for those who take the risks, then better decisions would be made. Or else failure would open up the market to new entities who would likely have a better way of doing business, naturally allowing the wealth to be spread among banks, businesses, etc. that have not been entrenched for years based solely on their reputations.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10133099335161753779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post-25775987018384884952012-11-07T00:22:18.082-06:002012-11-07T00:22:18.082-06:00Hey there, You've done an excellent job. I’ll ...Hey there, You've done an excellent job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my<br />friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this site.<br /><a href="http://www.capitalheight.com/nifty-future.php" title="Nifty Future Tips" rel="nofollow">Nifty Future Tips </a>stock tipshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05577089018902232128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post-56630105582965080822012-10-23T16:38:42.932-05:002012-10-23T16:38:42.932-05:00But shouldn't we consider the fact that the 1%...But shouldn't we consider the fact that the 1% (richest) are the ones that are also putting the most money back into the economy and have the most mobility to leave America and invest funding in other places? I don't think we can continue to make cuts on the wealthy based on equality because this leads to less incentives to become wealthier in America and to stay in America if you are already wealthy.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05463105357468238084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752771132348583018.post-56085648933815578542012-10-16T23:38:37.203-05:002012-10-16T23:38:37.203-05:00I would certainly agree with eliminating the mortg...I would certainly agree with eliminating the mortgage-interest deduction, entirely. In a society that is more and more concerned with the "1%", "fairness", and seems to foster growing hostility towards the wealthy -- the mortgage interest deduction yields the greatest rewards to the wealthy for buying expensive homes and ultimately drives up the prices of all US homes, making homes less accessible. It is one of the largest tax deductions and just so happens to be extremely regressive in its application. This is money that the government is arbitrarily giving back which causes distortions in the housing market. While a tough sell to most homeowners, eliminating this tax deduction would help make home buying more equitable.Brent Blackburnhttp://owen.vanderbilt.edunoreply@blogger.com